Skip to content
BuildMyRotation

HOKA Skyward X 2 vs Saucony Triumph 24

We haven't tested HOKA Skyward X 2 or Saucony Triumph 24 yet, so their role suitability is estimated from published specs.

HOKA Skyward X 2

HOKA

Skyward X 2

Check price

Review Pulse · Mostly positive · 75/100

Reviewers praise the ride and cushioning and split on the upper and value.

Saucony Triumph 24

Saucony

Triumph 24

Check price

Review Pulse · Strongly positive · 88/100

Reviewers praise the ride and cushioning and split on the upper and stability.

The differences that matter

  • Saucony Triumph 24 is 31 g lighter.
  • Saucony Triumph 24 has the higher drop (10 mm vs 5 mm).
  • Only HOKA Skyward X 2 has a carbon plate.
  • Saucony Triumph 24 costs $55 less at list price.

What reviewers say

Ride

HOKA Skyward X 2

Praised

A smooth, rockered max-stack cruiser that protects tired legs over long easy and steady runs; it is heavy and demands a heel or midfoot strike.

Saucony Triumph 24

Praised

Light and lively for its size, with a smooth rocker that keeps easy miles and long runs comfortable; a few find it sinks into the foam and loses snap once the pace lifts.

Cushioning

HOKA Skyward X 2

Praised

The tall PEBA and EVA stack delivers outstanding impact protection and a trampoline-like feel without the mushiness of the first version.

Saucony Triumph 24

Praised

Deep, plush protection that stays supportive well into long runs, and it bounces back rather than feeling like a marshmallow.

Upper

HOKA Skyward X 2

Divisive

The premium jacquard mesh is comfortable, secure and reasonably breathable, but the toe box is narrow and low-volume.

Saucony Triumph 24

Divisive

Padded, breathable and roomy for most, but a couple of reviewers find the forefoot tapered or the toe box shallow, and two hit an insole squeak.

Durability

HOKA Skyward X 2

Praised

Outsole rubber and midsole hold up well over long mileage, though the heel padding is a weak point in lab tests.

Saucony Triumph 24

Praised

Generous rubber coverage and little visible wear in long-term testing, with most expecting several hundred miles.

Grip

HOKA Skyward X 2

Praised

Wet and dry road traction is confident, but the central cutout picks up rocks on gravel.

Saucony Triumph 24

Praised

Sure-footed on dry and damp roads, and lab traction testing lands well above average.

Stability

HOKA Skyward X 2

Praised

A very wide platform, carbon plate and high sidewalls make the tall stack unusually stable for neutral runners.

Saucony Triumph 24

Divisive

The wide platform and sidewalls mostly keep the very soft midsole in check, but reviewers split: several call it stable for a neutral shoe, while others find the heel wobbly and rate it less stable than the Triumph 23.

Value

HOKA Skyward X 2

Divisive

At $225 it is expensive and limited to easy and steady paces, though reviewers see fair value for the cushioning and stability.

Saucony Triumph 24

Divisive

Many think $170 is fair for premium foam at this weight, but a sizeable minority call it steep for a daily trainer, especially next to cheaper rivals.

Which one to choose

Choose HOKA Skyward X 2 if…

  • you like a lower drop
  • you want a carbon plate
  • its stability is what you care about most

Reviewers recommend it for

  • Long easy runs
  • Recovery days
  • Runners wanting maximum cushioning

Choose Saucony Triumph 24 if…

  • you want the lighter shoe
  • you like a higher drop
  • price matters

Reviewers recommend it for

  • Easy and recovery runs
  • Long runs and high-mileage weeks
  • One soft, neutral daily trainer for most mileage

Specifications

Category
Max-cushion trainer
Max-cushion trainer
Price
$225
$170$55 less
Weight
281 g
250 g31 g lighter
Drop
5 mm5 mm lower drop
10 mm
Stack
44 / 39 mm1 mm more stack
43 / 33 mm
Plate
Carbon plate
Not reported
Stability
Neutral
Neutral
Foam
PEBA / Super Critical EVA
incrediLUX

Role suitability

DAILY

Best fit
Strong fit

RECOVERY

Best fit
Strong fit

LONG RUN

Best fit
Strong fit

TEMPO

Situational
Situational

RACE

Limited
Limited