HOKA Skyward X 2 vs Saucony Triumph 24
We haven't tested HOKA Skyward X 2 or Saucony Triumph 24 yet, so their role suitability is estimated from published specs.

HOKA
Skyward X 2
Check priceReview Pulse · Mostly positive · 75/100
Reviewers praise the ride and cushioning and split on the upper and value.

Saucony
Triumph 24
Check priceReview Pulse · Strongly positive · 88/100
Reviewers praise the ride and cushioning and split on the upper and stability.
The differences that matter
- Saucony Triumph 24 is 31 g lighter.
- Saucony Triumph 24 has the higher drop (10 mm vs 5 mm).
- Only HOKA Skyward X 2 has a carbon plate.
- Saucony Triumph 24 costs $55 less at list price.
What reviewers say
Ride
HOKA Skyward X 2
Praised
A smooth, rockered max-stack cruiser that protects tired legs over long easy and steady runs; it is heavy and demands a heel or midfoot strike.
Saucony Triumph 24
Praised
Light and lively for its size, with a smooth rocker that keeps easy miles and long runs comfortable; a few find it sinks into the foam and loses snap once the pace lifts.
Cushioning
HOKA Skyward X 2
Praised
The tall PEBA and EVA stack delivers outstanding impact protection and a trampoline-like feel without the mushiness of the first version.
Saucony Triumph 24
Praised
Deep, plush protection that stays supportive well into long runs, and it bounces back rather than feeling like a marshmallow.
Upper
HOKA Skyward X 2
Divisive
The premium jacquard mesh is comfortable, secure and reasonably breathable, but the toe box is narrow and low-volume.
Saucony Triumph 24
Divisive
Padded, breathable and roomy for most, but a couple of reviewers find the forefoot tapered or the toe box shallow, and two hit an insole squeak.
Durability
HOKA Skyward X 2
Praised
Outsole rubber and midsole hold up well over long mileage, though the heel padding is a weak point in lab tests.
Saucony Triumph 24
Praised
Generous rubber coverage and little visible wear in long-term testing, with most expecting several hundred miles.
Grip
HOKA Skyward X 2
Praised
Wet and dry road traction is confident, but the central cutout picks up rocks on gravel.
Saucony Triumph 24
Praised
Sure-footed on dry and damp roads, and lab traction testing lands well above average.
Stability
HOKA Skyward X 2
Praised
A very wide platform, carbon plate and high sidewalls make the tall stack unusually stable for neutral runners.
Saucony Triumph 24
Divisive
The wide platform and sidewalls mostly keep the very soft midsole in check, but reviewers split: several call it stable for a neutral shoe, while others find the heel wobbly and rate it less stable than the Triumph 23.
Value
HOKA Skyward X 2
Divisive
At $225 it is expensive and limited to easy and steady paces, though reviewers see fair value for the cushioning and stability.
Saucony Triumph 24
Divisive
Many think $170 is fair for premium foam at this weight, but a sizeable minority call it steep for a daily trainer, especially next to cheaper rivals.
Which one to choose
Choose HOKA Skyward X 2 if…
- you like a lower drop
- you want a carbon plate
- its stability is what you care about most
Reviewers recommend it for
- Long easy runs
- Recovery days
- Runners wanting maximum cushioning
Choose Saucony Triumph 24 if…
- you want the lighter shoe
- you like a higher drop
- price matters
Reviewers recommend it for
- Easy and recovery runs
- Long runs and high-mileage weeks
- One soft, neutral daily trainer for most mileage
Specifications
- Category
- Max-cushion trainer
- Max-cushion trainer
- Price
- $225
- $170$55 less
- Weight
- 281 g
- 250 g31 g lighter
- Drop
- 5 mm5 mm lower drop
- 10 mm
- Stack
- 44 / 39 mm1 mm more stack
- 43 / 33 mm
- Plate
- Carbon plate
- Not reported
- Stability
- Neutral
- Neutral
- Foam
- PEBA / Super Critical EVA
- incrediLUX
Role suitability
DAILY
RECOVERY
LONG RUN
TEMPO
RACE