ASICS Sonicblast 2 vs Saucony Endorphin Azura
We haven't tested ASICS Sonicblast 2 or Saucony Endorphin Azura yet, so their role suitability is estimated from published specs.

ASICS
Sonicblast 2
Check priceReview Pulse · Mostly positive · 75/100
Reviewers praise the ride and upper and split on the cushioning and stability.

Saucony
Endorphin Azura
Check priceReview Pulse · Mostly positive · 88/100
Reviewers praise the cushioning and stability and split on the ride and upper.
The differences that matter
- ASICS Sonicblast 2 has 6 mm more foam under the heel.
- Saucony Endorphin Azura costs $40 less at list price.
What reviewers say
Ride
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
The redesigned shoe is more fluid and lively at marathon and tempo efforts, though its stiff midfoot and less energetic heel can feel awkward at easy paces.
Saucony Endorphin Azura
Divisive
A firm, aggressively rockered ride that is versatile across paces but too firm and rockered for some runners.
Cushioning
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Divisive
The high stack protects well on long runs, but its firmer feel is not to every runner’s taste and the forefoot bounce is more noticeable than the heel.
Saucony Endorphin Azura
Praised
PWRRUN PB provides strong impact protection that holds up well over long runs without feeling mushy.
Upper
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
The lighter mesh is breathable and generally secure with useful toe volume, though some find the racer-focused upper less plush and the toe shape tapered.
Saucony Endorphin Azura
Divisive
A secure, breathable upper with a normal fit, though the toe box and medial sidewall bother some testers.
Durability
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
Early reports and lab testing suggest the outsole holds up well, while the thin toe mesh is a possible weak point.
Saucony Endorphin Azura
Praised
The outsole rubber and foam hold up well for a lightweight trainer, with solid coverage in high-wear areas.
Grip
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
Lab results are excellent and runners report dependable road traction, with no major grip concerns in early use.
Saucony Endorphin Azura
Praised
Traction is reliable on dry and wet roads, with enough grip for light paths.
Stability
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Divisive
Several reviewers find the broad geometry and firmer foam unusually composed for a tall trainer, while others caution it is still a neutral shoe and not the most stable option.
Saucony Endorphin Azura
Praised
A wide base, sidewalls and firm foam make the rockered platform unusually stable for a neutral trainer.
Value
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Divisive
Some consider the price reasonable for a versatile plated trainer, while others question the premium given the ride and alternatives in the range.
Saucony Endorphin Azura
Praised
At $150 it is a strong value for a versatile PEBA trainer.
Which one to choose
Choose ASICS Sonicblast 2 if…
- you want more foam under you
- its ride is what you care about most
- its upper is what you care about most
Reviewers recommend it for
- Tempo sessions and marathon-pace long runs
- Runners wanting a plated trainer without a carbon plate
- Runners seeking high cushioning with a firmer, controlled feel
Choose Saucony Endorphin Azura if…
- you prefer to feel closer to the ground
- price matters
- its cushioning is what you care about most
- its stability is what you care about most
Reviewers recommend it for
- Daily training
- Tempo runs
- Long runs
Specifications
- Category
- Tempo / workout
- Tempo / workout
- Price
- $190
- $150$40 less
- Weight
- 241 g
- 240 g1 g lighter
- Drop
- 8 mm
- 8 mm
- Stack
- 46 / 38 mm6 mm more stack
- 40 / 32 mm
- Plate
- Not reported
- Not reported
- Stability
- Neutral
- Neutral
- Foam
- FF TURBO SQUARED / FF BLAST MAX
- PWRRUN PB
Role suitability
DAILY
RECOVERY
LONG RUN
TEMPO
RACE
