Skip to content
BuildMyRotation

ASICS Sonicblast 2 vs Mizuno Neo Vista 3

We haven't tested ASICS Sonicblast 2 or Mizuno Neo Vista 3 yet, so their role suitability is estimated from published specs.

ASICS Sonicblast 2

ASICS

Sonicblast 2

Check price

Review Pulse · Mostly positive · 75/100

Reviewers praise the ride and upper and split on the cushioning and stability.

Mizuno Neo Vista 3

Mizuno

Neo Vista 3

Check price

Review Pulse · Mostly positive · 88/100

Reviewers praise the ride and cushioning, criticise the value and split on the stability.

The differences that matter

  • ASICS Sonicblast 2 is 24 g lighter.
  • ASICS Sonicblast 2 costs $10 less at list price.

What reviewers say

Ride

ASICS Sonicblast 2

Praised

The redesigned shoe is more fluid and lively at marathon and tempo efforts, though its stiff midfoot and less energetic heel can feel awkward at easy paces.

Mizuno Neo Vista 3

Praised

A smooth, rockered max-cushion ride that is easy on tired legs and can handle moderate tempo work, though it feels bulky at speed.

Cushioning

ASICS Sonicblast 2

Divisive

The high stack protects well on long runs, but its firmer feel is not to every runner’s taste and the forefoot bounce is more noticeable than the heel.

Mizuno Neo Vista 3

Praised

The deep, plush Enerzy NXT stack delivers outstanding shock absorption and protection over long distances.

Upper

ASICS Sonicblast 2

Praised

The lighter mesh is breathable and generally secure with useful toe volume, though some find the racer-focused upper less plush and the toe shape tapered.

Mizuno Neo Vista 3

Praised

The sock-like knit upper is comfortable, breathable and secure at the heel; it can feel narrow for wide feet and high arches.

Durability

ASICS Sonicblast 2

Praised

Early reports and lab testing suggest the outsole holds up well, while the thin toe mesh is a possible weak point.

Mizuno Neo Vista 3

Praised

X10 outsole rubber shows minimal wear, though the heel padding is a weak point in lab tests.

Grip

ASICS Sonicblast 2

Praised

Lab results are excellent and runners report dependable road traction, with no major grip concerns in early use.

Mizuno Neo Vista 3

Praised

Wet-road traction is a clear improvement over the previous version and is reliable in rain.

Stability

ASICS Sonicblast 2

Divisive

Several reviewers find the broad geometry and firmer foam unusually composed for a tall trainer, while others caution it is still a neutral shoe and not the most stable option.

Mizuno Neo Vista 3

Divisive

A wide platform and wave plate keep the tall stack reasonably steady for neutral runners, but the soft foam is not for anyone needing support.

Value

ASICS Sonicblast 2

Divisive

Some consider the price reasonable for a versatile plated trainer, while others question the premium given the ride and alternatives in the range.

Mizuno Neo Vista 3

Criticised

At $200 the modest energy return and heavy build make it hard to justify against cheaper, livelier super trainers.

Which one to choose

Choose ASICS Sonicblast 2 if…

  • you want the lighter shoe
  • price matters

Reviewers recommend it for

  • Tempo sessions and marathon-pace long runs
  • Runners wanting a plated trainer without a carbon plate
  • Runners seeking high cushioning with a firmer, controlled feel

Choose Mizuno Neo Vista 3 if…

  • its cushioning is what you care about most

Reviewers recommend it for

  • Long easy runs and recovery days
  • Runners wanting maximum cushioning
  • Neutral heel strikers

Specifications

Category
Tempo / workout
Tempo / workout
Price
$190$10 less
$200
Weight
241 g24 g lighter
265 g
Drop
8 mm
8 mm
Stack
46 / 38 mm1.5 mm more stack
44.5 / 36.5 mm
Plate
Not reported
Not reported
Stability
Neutral
Neutral
Foam
FF TURBO SQUARED / FF BLAST MAX
MIZUNO ENERZY NXT

Role suitability

DAILY

Good fit
Good fit

RECOVERY

Limited
Limited

LONG RUN

Good fit
Good fit

TEMPO

Strong fit
Strong fit

RACE

Good fit
Situational