ASICS Sonicblast 2 vs Mizuno Neo Vista 3
We haven't tested ASICS Sonicblast 2 or Mizuno Neo Vista 3 yet, so their role suitability is estimated from published specs.

ASICS
Sonicblast 2
Check priceReview Pulse · Mostly positive · 75/100
Reviewers praise the ride and upper and split on the cushioning and stability.

Mizuno
Neo Vista 3
Check priceReview Pulse · Mostly positive · 88/100
Reviewers praise the ride and cushioning, criticise the value and split on the stability.
The differences that matter
- ASICS Sonicblast 2 is 24 g lighter.
- ASICS Sonicblast 2 costs $10 less at list price.
What reviewers say
Ride
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
The redesigned shoe is more fluid and lively at marathon and tempo efforts, though its stiff midfoot and less energetic heel can feel awkward at easy paces.
Mizuno Neo Vista 3
Praised
A smooth, rockered max-cushion ride that is easy on tired legs and can handle moderate tempo work, though it feels bulky at speed.
Cushioning
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Divisive
The high stack protects well on long runs, but its firmer feel is not to every runner’s taste and the forefoot bounce is more noticeable than the heel.
Mizuno Neo Vista 3
Praised
The deep, plush Enerzy NXT stack delivers outstanding shock absorption and protection over long distances.
Upper
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
The lighter mesh is breathable and generally secure with useful toe volume, though some find the racer-focused upper less plush and the toe shape tapered.
Mizuno Neo Vista 3
Praised
The sock-like knit upper is comfortable, breathable and secure at the heel; it can feel narrow for wide feet and high arches.
Durability
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
Early reports and lab testing suggest the outsole holds up well, while the thin toe mesh is a possible weak point.
Mizuno Neo Vista 3
Praised
X10 outsole rubber shows minimal wear, though the heel padding is a weak point in lab tests.
Grip
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
Lab results are excellent and runners report dependable road traction, with no major grip concerns in early use.
Mizuno Neo Vista 3
Praised
Wet-road traction is a clear improvement over the previous version and is reliable in rain.
Stability
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Divisive
Several reviewers find the broad geometry and firmer foam unusually composed for a tall trainer, while others caution it is still a neutral shoe and not the most stable option.
Mizuno Neo Vista 3
Divisive
A wide platform and wave plate keep the tall stack reasonably steady for neutral runners, but the soft foam is not for anyone needing support.
Value
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Divisive
Some consider the price reasonable for a versatile plated trainer, while others question the premium given the ride and alternatives in the range.
Mizuno Neo Vista 3
Criticised
At $200 the modest energy return and heavy build make it hard to justify against cheaper, livelier super trainers.
Which one to choose
Choose ASICS Sonicblast 2 if…
- you want the lighter shoe
- price matters
Reviewers recommend it for
- Tempo sessions and marathon-pace long runs
- Runners wanting a plated trainer without a carbon plate
- Runners seeking high cushioning with a firmer, controlled feel
Choose Mizuno Neo Vista 3 if…
- its cushioning is what you care about most
Reviewers recommend it for
- Long easy runs and recovery days
- Runners wanting maximum cushioning
- Neutral heel strikers
Specifications
- Category
- Tempo / workout
- Tempo / workout
- Price
- $190$10 less
- $200
- Weight
- 241 g24 g lighter
- 265 g
- Drop
- 8 mm
- 8 mm
- Stack
- 46 / 38 mm1.5 mm more stack
- 44.5 / 36.5 mm
- Plate
- Not reported
- Not reported
- Stability
- Neutral
- Neutral
- Foam
- FF TURBO SQUARED / FF BLAST MAX
- MIZUNO ENERZY NXT
Role suitability
DAILY
RECOVERY
LONG RUN
TEMPO
RACE