ASICS Megablast vs ASICS Sonicblast 2
We haven't tested ASICS Megablast or ASICS Sonicblast 2 yet, so their role suitability is estimated from published specs.

ASICS
Megablast
Check priceReview Pulse · Strongly positive · 89/100
Reviewers praise the ride and cushioning, criticise the value and split on the upper.

ASICS
Sonicblast 2
Check priceReview Pulse · Mostly positive · 75/100
Reviewers praise the ride and upper and split on the cushioning and stability.
The differences that matter
- ASICS Megablast is 17 g lighter.
- ASICS Sonicblast 2 costs $35 less at list price.
What reviewers say
Ride
ASICS Megablast
Praised
Springy and fast once the pace picks up; several reviewers find it flat at slow jogging speeds, and one finds the wide platform bulky.
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
The redesigned shoe is more fluid and lively at marathon and tempo efforts, though its stiff midfoot and less energetic heel can feel awkward at easy paces.
Cushioning
ASICS Megablast
Praised
Deep, protective stack that holds up on long runs, though one reviewer calls the foam firm rather than soft.
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Divisive
The high stack protects well on long runs, but its firmer feel is not to every runner’s taste and the forefoot bounce is more noticeable than the heel.
Upper
ASICS Megablast
Divisive
Light and breathable, but the most common fit complaint: a shallow, tapered toe box, a stiff toe piece, lace bite and a scratchy liner for some.
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
The lighter mesh is breathable and generally secure with useful toe volume, though some find the racer-focused upper less plush and the toe shape tapered.
Durability
ASICS Megablast
Praised
Long-term testers report little foam or outsole wear at 100 to 250 miles and expect it to last well past 600; one lab test flags a weak toe box.
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
Early reports and lab testing suggest the outsole holds up well, while the thin toe mesh is a possible weak point.
Grip
ASICS Megablast
Praised
Sticky on dry and wet pavement; the exposed foam makes it a poor choice for gravel or trails.
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Praised
Lab results are excellent and runners report dependable road traction, with no major grip concerns in early use.
Stability
ASICS Megablast
Praised
Most reviewers find the wide base and firmer foam surprisingly stable for the height; two find the tall platform wobbly, especially at the heel.
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Divisive
Several reviewers find the broad geometry and firmer foam unusually composed for a tall trainer, while others caution it is still a neutral shoe and not the most stable option.
Value
ASICS Megablast
Criticised
The most common complaint: expensive for an unplated trainer. A few long-term testers say the durability earns back the price.
ASICS Sonicblast 2
Divisive
Some consider the price reasonable for a versatile plated trainer, while others question the premium given the ride and alternatives in the range.
Which one to choose
Choose ASICS Megablast if…
- you want the lighter shoe
- its cushioning is what you care about most
- its stability is what you care about most
Reviewers recommend it for
- One shoe for daily miles, long runs and tempo work
- Runners who want super-foam bounce without a carbon plate
- Neutral runners with narrow to average feet
Choose ASICS Sonicblast 2 if…
- price matters
- its upper is what you care about most
Reviewers recommend it for
- Tempo sessions and marathon-pace long runs
- Runners wanting a plated trainer without a carbon plate
- Runners seeking high cushioning with a firmer, controlled feel
Specifications
- Category
- Tempo / workout
- Tempo / workout
- Price
- $225
- $190$35 less
- Weight
- 224 g17 g lighter
- 241 g
- Drop
- 8 mm
- 8 mm
- Stack
- 45 / 37 mm
- 46 / 38 mm1 mm more stack
- Plate
- Not reported
- Not reported
- Stability
- Neutral
- Neutral
- Foam
- FF TURBO SQUARED
- FF TURBO SQUARED / FF BLAST MAX
Role suitability
DAILY
RECOVERY
LONG RUN
TEMPO
RACE