ASICS Gel Kayano 33 vs ASICS GT 2000 15
We haven't tested ASICS Gel Kayano 33 or ASICS GT 2000 15 yet, so their role suitability is estimated from published specs.

ASICS
Gel Kayano 33
Check priceReview Pulse · Mostly positive · 72/100
Reviewers praise the cushioning and upper and split on the ride and value.

ASICS
GT 2000 15
Check priceReview Pulse · Mostly positive · 75/100
Reviewers praise the ride and cushioning and criticise the upper.
The differences that matter
- ASICS GT 2000 15 is 46 g lighter.
- ASICS GT 2000 15 costs $20 less at list price.
What reviewers say
Ride
ASICS Gel Kayano 33
Divisive
Smooth, plush and stable at easy paces, but reviewers split on whether the new dual-foam setup is an improvement: some find it softer and more natural, others find it firm, flat and forgettable.
ASICS GT 2000 15
Praised
The lighter, more energetic GT remains a stable daily trainer and can manage some uptempo work, though several reviewers find the firmer heel or added weight less smooth at faster paces.
Cushioning
ASICS Gel Kayano 33
Praised
Plush, protective cushioning that holds up over long runs without turning mushy, especially in the heel.
ASICS GT 2000 15
Praised
The higher stack and revised FF BLAST MAX foam improve protection and bounce, while remaining firmer and less plush than premium max-cushion shoes.
Upper
ASICS Gel Kayano 33
Praised
Comfortable, secure and well padded, with a roomy forefoot for most; the main complaint is a laterally tapered toe box that pinches the outer toes and a warm, heavily padded rear.
ASICS GT 2000 15
Criticised
The woven upper locks the foot securely, but the snug, tapered, low-volume toe box and stiff heel counter are common fit complaints; wide options help some runners.
Durability
ASICS Gel Kayano 33
Praised
Thick outsole rubber, a durable dual-layer mesh and little wear in testing point to a long life.
ASICS GT 2000 15
Praised
Lab abrasion results and early road testing point to durable mesh and substantial outsole life.
Grip
ASICS Gel Kayano 33
Praised
Hybrid ASICSGRIP is excellent on wet and dry pavement, with one lab result among the best tested; loose gravel and slick stone are weaker.
ASICS GT 2000 15
Praised
The AHAR rubber outsole earns strong wet-road traction results and testers report reliable grip in rainy conditions.
Stability
ASICS Gel Kayano 33
Praised
A broad, rigid platform and the new FluidSupport system give confident, unintrusive guidance, though one reviewer finds the medial midfoot support thin for a stability shoe.
ASICS GT 2000 15
Praised
The 3D Guidance geometry and broad platform provide centered, unobtrusive support for mild-to-moderate overpronation.
Value
ASICS Gel Kayano 33
Divisive
Some say it earns its $170 as a premium stability trainer, while others argue the Kayano 32 on sale or lighter rivals offer more for less.
ASICS GT 2000 15
Praised
At about $150, reviewers see a durable, lighter stability trainer with enough versatility to justify the modest price increase.
Which one to choose
Choose ASICS Gel Kayano 33 if…
- its upper is what you care about most
Reviewers recommend it for
- Overpronators who want gentle, natural guidance
- Easy runs and long, steady mileage
- All-day standing and walking
Choose ASICS GT 2000 15 if…
- you want the lighter shoe
- price matters
- its ride is what you care about most
- its value is what you care about most
Reviewers recommend it for
- Daily training for mild-to-moderate overpronation
- Runners wanting lighter, less intrusive stability
- Long runs and steady uptempo miles
Specifications
- Category
- Stability daily trainer
- Stability daily trainer
- Price
- $170
- $150$20 less
- Weight
- 298 g
- 252 g46 g lighter
- Drop
- 8 mm
- 8 mm
- Stack
- 39 / 31 mm1 mm more stack
- 38 / 30 mm
- Plate
- Not reported
- Not reported
- Stability
- Stability
- Stability
- Foam
- FF BLAST MAX / FF BLAST PLUS
- FF BLAST MAX
Role suitability
DAILY
RECOVERY
LONG RUN
TEMPO
RACE